This species name was not found in The Plant List
This species has no synonyms in The Plant List
[Number of papers mentioning Nematoceras dienema: 2]
Popularity of Nematoceras dienema over time
[Left-hand Plot: Plot of numbers of papers mentioning Nematoceras dienema (histogram and left hand axis scale of left-hand plot) and line of best fit, 1901 to 2013 (equation and % variation accounted for in box); Right-hand Plot: Plot of a proportional micro index, derived from numbers of papers mentioning Nematoceras dienema as a proportion (scaled by multiplying by one million) of the approximate total number of papers available in databases for that year (frequency polygon and left-hand axis scale of right-hand plot) and line of best fit, 1901 to 2013 (equation and % variation accounted for in box)]
[Total number of keywords included in the papers that mentioned this species: 21]
Alien (2), Conservation (2), Eradication (2), Human impact (2), Non-indigenous (2), Non-native (2), Endemism (1), glacial refugia (1), LGM ice cover (1), palaeobotany (1), phanerogamic flora (1), post-glacial immigration (1), pre-LGM survivors (1), regionalism (1), subantarctic islands (1)
Most likely scope for
crop use/product (%):
[Please note: When there are only a few papers mentioning a species, care should be taken with the interpretation of these crop use/product results; as well, a mention may relate to the use of a species, or the context in which it grows, rather than a product]
Insufficient data to carry out a crop use/product analysis
References (and links
[Number of papers mentioning Nematoceras dienema: 2; Any undated papers have been included at the end]
Hughes KA and Convey P (2012) Determining the native/non-native status of newly discovered terrestrial and freshwater species in Antarctica – Current knowledge, methodology and management action. Journal of Environmental Management 93, 52-66.
Van der Putten N, Verbruggen C, Ochyra R, Verleyen E and Frenot Y (2010) Subantarctic flowering plants: pre-glacial survivors or post-glacial immigrants? Journal of Biogeography 37, 582-592.
Hughes KA and Convey P Determining the native/non-native status of newly discovered terrestrial and freshwater species in Antarctica – Current knowledge, methodology and management action. Journal of Environmental Management 93, 52-66.
RIRDC Farm Diversity Website: http://www.farmdiversity.com.au/
RIRDC New and Developing Plant
RIRDC New Crop Industries Handbook
Grateful acknowledgment is made to the following: for plant names: Australian Plant Name Index, Australian National Herbarium http://www.anbg.gov.au/cpbr/databases/apni-search-full.html; ; The International Plant Names Index, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew/Harvard University Herbaria/Australian National Herbarium http://www.ipni.org/index.html; Plants Database, United States Department of Agriculture, National Resources Conservation Service http://plants.usda.gov/;DJ Mabberley (1997) The Plant Book, Cambridge University Press (Second Edition); JH Wiersma and B Leon (1999) World Economic Plants, CRC Press; RJ Hnatiuk (1990) Census of Australian Vascular Plants, Australian Government Publishing Service; for information: Science Direct http://www.sciencedirect.com/; Wiley Online Library http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/advanced/search; High Wire http://highwire.stanford.edu/cgi/search; Oxford Journals http://services.oxfordjournals.org/search.dtl; USDA National Agricultural Library http://agricola.nal.usda.gov/booleancube/booleancube_search_cit.html; for synonyms: The Plant List http://www.theplantlist.org/; for common names: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page; etc.
All information is included in good faith but this website does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of any information on these pages, nor does the website accept responsibility for any loss arising from the use of this information. Views and opinions are those of the authors themselves. Every effort has been made to respect copyright owners' rights.
Contact: Webmaster, Australian New
Latest update 31 July 2014 by: ANCW