Australian New Crops Info 2016
Supported by the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation

Listing of Interesting Plants of the World:

Nephroma resupinatum

 

 

This species name was not found in The Plant List

 

This species has no synonyms in The Plant List

 

Common names:

Kidney Lichen

 

 

Trends (five databases) 1901-2013:
[Number of papers mentioning Nephroma resupinatum: 30]

 

 

Popularity of Nephroma resupinatum over time
[Left-hand Plot: Plot of numbers of papers mentioning Nephroma resupinatum (histogram and left hand axis scale of left-hand plot) and line of best fit, 1901 to 2013 (equation and % variation accounted for in box); Right-hand Plot: Plot of a proportional micro index, derived from numbers of papers mentioning Nephroma resupinatum as a proportion (scaled by multiplying by one million) of the approximate total number of papers available in databases for that year (frequency polygon and left-hand axis scale of right-hand plot) and line of best fit, 1901 to 2013 (equation and % variation accounted for in box)] 

[For larger charts showing the numbers of papers that have mentioned this species over years, select this link; there are links to come back from there]

 

Keywords

[Total number of keywords included in the papers that mentioned this species: 164]

 

lichens (8), Indicator species (7), Cyanolichens (6), Forest management (6), Biodiversity (3), bryophytes (3), Lichen (3), Red-listed species (3), Alien species (2), Coarse woody debris (2), Community structure (2), conservation (2), Cryptogams (2), Dry season (2), Environmental gradient (2), Epiphytic lichens (2), Epiphytic richness (2), extinction (2), Fagus sylvatica (2), forest conservation (2), forestry (2), Green-tree retention (2), Lichen conservation (2), Macrolichens (2), Nationally rare lichen species (2), Nostoc (2), old-growth (2), Populus tremula (2), Rare species (2), symbiosis (2), Trentepohlioid lichens (2), Variable retention harvesting (2), vascular plants (2), Air quality (1), Ascomycota (1), aspen (1), Beetles (1), Biomonitoring (1), Boreal forest (1), boreal forests (1), botany (1), Butterfly (1), Canopy lichens (1), Climate change (1), Coarse woody debris (CWD) (1), Coccomyxa (1), colonization (1), Core–periphery theory (1), Core–periphery theory (1), corticolo (1), corticolous (1), Cyanobacteria (1), Decay class (1), Dispersal strategies (1), Diversity (1), dynamic landscape (1), ENFA (1), epixylic (1), Espagne (1), España (1), Forest Act (1), forest continuity (1), Forest health monitoring' (1), functional guild (1), Fungi (1), Galice (1), Galicia (1), GIS (1), habitat quality (1), Homoplasy (1), Inland temperate rainforest (1), Insect (1), ITS (1), Lecanorales (1), líquenes (1), Liverwort (1), management (1), Molecular phylogenetics (1), Moss (1), Natura 2000 network (1), Nephroma (1), NOx (1), phylogeny (1), Plant Science and Plant Products (1), plants (1), Polypores (1), Porpidia (1), Potential distribution (1), Predictive ecosystem mapping (1), Quercus robur (1), Relative soil moisture (1), Resident birds (1), Resolution (1), Scotland (1), Site selection (1), SO2 (1), Spain (1), SSU rDNA (1), Stand age (1), Sub-boreal spruce forest (1), Sweden (1), Taxon sampling (1), Thuja plicata (1), Total suspended particles (1), Transient species (1), Urban environment (1), variable retention (1), woodland key habitat (1)

 

[If all keywords are not here (as indicated by .....), they can be accessed from this link; there are links to come back from there]

 

 

Most likely scope for crop use/product (%):
[Please note: When there are only a few papers mentioning a species, care should be taken with the interpretation of these crop use/product results; as well, a mention may relate to the use of a species, or the context in which it grows, rather than a product]

 

ornamental (54.24), timber (19.90), hemiparasite (6.48), medicinal (2.73), fruit (1.99), boundary (1.68), weed (1.50), starch (0.90), poison (0.71), cereal (0.64)…..

 

[To see the full list of crop use/product outcomes, from searching abstracts of the papers that have mentioned this species, select this link; details of the analysis process have also been included; there are links to come back from there]

 

 

Recent mentions of this species in the literature:
[since 2012, with links to abstracts; The references from 1901-2013 which have been used for the trend, keyword and crop use/product analyses below, are listed below these references]

 

O’Brien HE, Miadlikowska J and Lutzoni F (2013) Assessing population structure and host specialization in lichenized cyanobacteria. New Phytologist 198, 557-566. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.12165

Aragón G, Martínez I and García A (2012) Loss of epiphytic diversity along a latitudinal gradient in southern Europe. Science of The Total Environment 426, 188-195. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969712004147

Fedrowitz K, Kaasalainen U and Rikkinen J (2012) Geographic mosaic of symbiont selectivity in a genus of epiphytic cyanolichens. Ecology and Evolution 2, 2291-2303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.343

Fedrowitz K, Kuusinen M and Snäll T (2012) Metapopulation dynamics and future persistence of epiphytic cyanolichens in a European boreal forest ecosystem. Journal of Applied Ecology 49, 493-502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02113.x

 

 

References 1901-2013 (and links to abstracts):
[Number of papers mentioning Nephroma resupinatum: 30; Any undated papers have been included at the end]

 

Aragón G, Martínez I and García A (2012) Loss of epiphytic diversity along a latitudinal gradient in southern Europe. Science of The Total Environment 426, 188-195.  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969712004147

Fedrowitz K, Kaasalainen U and Rikkinen J (2012) Geographic mosaic of symbiont selectivity in a genus of epiphytic cyanolichens. Ecology and Evolution 2, 2291-2303.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.343

Fedrowitz K, Kuusinen M and Snäll T (2012) Metapopulation dynamics and future persistence of epiphytic cyanolichens in a European boreal forest ecosystem. Journal of Applied Ecology 49, 493-502.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02113.x

Hautala H, Laaka-Lindberg S and Vanha-Majamaa I (2011) Effects of Retention Felling on Epixylic Species in Boreal Spruce Forests in Southern Finland. Restoration Ecology 19, 418-429.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00545.x

Nascimbene J, Brunialti G, Ravera S, Frati L and Caniglia G (2010) Testing Lobaria pulmonaria (L.) Hoffm. as an indicator of lichen conservation importance of Italian forests. Ecological Indicators 10, 353-360.  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X09001149

Nascimbene J and Marini L (2010) Oak forest exploitation and black-locust invasion caused severe shifts in epiphytic lichen communities in Northern Italy. Science of The Total Environment 408, 5506-5512.  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969710007503

Perez-Ortega S, Rios Adl, Crespo A and Sancho LG (2010) Symbiotic lifestyle and phylogenetic relationships of the bionts of Mastodia tessellata (Ascomycota, incertae sedis). Am. J. Botany 97, 738-752.  http://www.amjbot.org/cgi/content/abstract/97/5/738

Botting RS and DeLong C (2009) Macrolichen and bryophyte responses to coarse woody debris characteristics in sub-boreal spruce forest. Forest Ecology and Management 258, Supplement, S85-S94.  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112709006136

Perhans K, Appelgren L, Jonsson F, Nordin U, SÖderstrÖm B and Gustafsson L (2009) Retention patches as potential refugia for bryophytes and lichens in managed forest landscapes. Biological Conservation 142, 1125-1133.  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320709000603

Perhans K, Appelgren L, Jonsson F, Nordin U, Söderström B and Gustafsson L (2009) Retention patches as potential refugia for bryophytes and lichens in managed forest landscapes. Biological Conservation 142, 1125-1133.  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320709000603

Radies D, Coxson D, Johnson C and Konwicki K (2009) Predicting canopy macrolichen diversity and abundance within old-growth inland temperate rainforests. Forest Ecology and Management 259, 86-97.  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112709007063

Elhai J, Kato M, Cousins S, Lindblad P and Costa JL (2008) Very small mobile repeated elements in cyanobacterial genomes. Genome Res. 18, 1484-1499.  http://genome.cshlp.org/cgi/content/abstract/18/9/1484

Hauck M, Jurgens S-R, Brinkmann M and Herminghaus S (2008) Surface Hydrophobicity Causes SO2 Tolerance in Lichens. Ann. Bot. 101, 531-539.  http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/101/4/531

Hurme E, Mönkkönen M, Sippola A-L, Ylinen H and Pentinsaari M (2008) Role of the Siberian flying squirrel as an umbrella species for biodiversity in northern boreal forests. Ecological Indicators 8, 246-255.  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X0700026X

Geiser LH and Neitlich PN (2007) Air pollution and climate gradients in western Oregon and Washington indicated by epiphytic macrolichens. Environmental Pollution 145, 203-218.  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749106002120

Isocrono D, Matteucci E, Ferrarese A, Pensi E and Piervittori R (2007) Lichen colonization in the city of Turin (N Italy) based on current and historical data. Environmental Pollution 145, 258-265.  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749106002181

Martínez I, Carreño F, Escudero A and Rubio A (2006) Are threatened lichen species well-protected in Spain? Effectiveness of a protected areas network. Biological Conservation 133, 500-511.  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320706003168

Pykälä J, Heikkinen RK, Toivonen H and Jääskeläinen K (2006) Importance of Forest Act habitats for epiphytic lichens in Finnish managed forests. Forest Ecology and Management 223, 84-92.  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112705006845

Philip S (2005) Estimating local extinction rates over successive time-frames. Biological Conservation 121, 281-287.  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320704002010

Sætersdal M, Gjerde I and Blom HH (2005) Indicator species and the problem of spatial inconsistency in nestedness patterns. Biological Conservation 122, 305-316.  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320704003490

Buschbom J and Mueller G (2004) Resolving evolutionary relationships in the lichen-forming genus Porpidia and related allies (Porpidiaceae, Ascomycota). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 32, 66-82.  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105579030300424X

Lohtander K, Oksanen I and Rikkinen J (2003) Genetic diversity of green algal and cyanobacterial photobionts in Nephroma (Peltigerales). The Lichenologist 35, 325-339.  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024282903000513

Lohtander K, Oksanen I and Rikkinen J (2002) A phylogenetic study of Nephroma (lichen-forming Ascomycota). Mycological Research 106, 777-787.  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0953756208601161

Alvarez Andrés J and Carballal Duràn R (2000) Flora liquenica sobre Quercus robur L. en galicia (NW España). Cryptogamie Mycologie 21, 103-117.  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S018115840000107X

Hedenås H and Ericson L (2000) Epiphytic macrolichens as conservation indicators: successional sequence in Populus tremula stands. Biological Conservation 93, 43-53.  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320799001135

Uliczka H and Angelstam P (2000) Assessing conservation values of forest stands based on specialised lichens and birds. Biological Conservation 95, 343-351.  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320700000227

Ohlson M, Söderström L, Hörnberg G, Zackrisson O and Hermansson J (1997) Habitat qualities versus long-term continuity as determinants of biodiversity in boreal old-growth swamp forests. Biological Conservation 81, 221-231.  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320797000013

Mikko K (1996) Cyanobacterial macrolichens on Populus tremula as indicators of forest continuity in Finland. Biological Conservation 75, 43-49.  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0006320795000399

Andrews GA, Chavey PS and Smith JE (1992) Reactivity of lichen lectins with blood typed canine erythrocytes. Research in Veterinary Science 53, 315-319.  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/003452889290132L

Letrouit-Galinou MA and Lallemant R (1970) The development of the shields of Nephroma resupinatum (L.) Ach. lichen, Nephromaceae. Le developpement des apothecies du Nephroma resupinatum (L.) Ach. lichen, Nephromacee. Revue generale de botanique 77, 916.

AragÓn G, MartÍnez I and GarcÍa A Loss of epiphytic diversity along a latitudinal gradient in southern Europe. Science of The Total Environment 426, 188-195.  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969712004147

Burgaz AR and Martínez I The genus Nephroma Ach. in the Iberian Peninsula. Cryptogamie Mycologie 20, 225-235.  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S018115840087030X

Nascimbene J, Brunialti G, Ravera S, Frati L and Caniglia G Testing Lobaria pulmonaria (L.) Hoffm. as an indicator of lichen conservation importance of Italian forests. Ecological Indicators 10, 353-360.  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X09001149

Nascimbene J and Marini L Oak forest exploitation and black-locust invasion caused severe shifts in epiphytic lichen communities in Northern Italy. Science of The Total Environment 408, 5506-5512.  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969710007503

Perez-Ortega S, Rios Adl, Crespo A and Sancho LG Symbiotic lifestyle and phylogenetic relationships of the bionts of Mastodia tessellata (Ascomycota, incertae sedis). Am. J. Botany 97, 738-752.  http://www.amjbot.org/cgi/content/abstract/97/5/738

 


RIRDC Farm Diversity Website: http://www.farmdiversity.com.au/

 

Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC)
Home Page

RIRDC New and Developing Plant Industries
Home Page

includes publications and project reports

RIRDC New Crop Industries Handbook
530 pages
as pdf download


RIRDC
essential oils, tea tree oil, wildflowers and natives, bioenergy, organic farming


Grateful acknowledgment is made to the following: for plant names: Australian Plant Name Index, Australian National Herbarium http://www.anbg.gov.au/cpbr/databases/apni-search-full.html; ; The International Plant Names Index, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew/Harvard University Herbaria/Australian National Herbarium http://www.ipni.org/index.html; Plants Database, United States Department of Agriculture, National Resources Conservation Service http://plants.usda.gov/;DJ Mabberley (1997) The Plant Book, Cambridge University Press (Second Edition); JH Wiersma and B Leon (1999) World Economic Plants, CRC Press; RJ Hnatiuk (1990) Census of Australian Vascular Plants, Australian Government Publishing Service; for information: Science Direct http://www.sciencedirect.com/; Wiley Online Library http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/advanced/search; High Wire http://highwire.stanford.edu/cgi/search; Oxford Journals http://services.oxfordjournals.org/search.dtl; USDA National Agricultural Library http://agricola.nal.usda.gov/booleancube/booleancube_search_cit.html; for synonyms: The Plant List http://www.theplantlist.org/; for common names: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page; etc.


All information is included in good faith but this website does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of any information on these pages, nor does the website accept responsibility for any loss arising from the use of this information.  Views and opinions are those of the authors themselves.  Every effort has been made to respect copyright owners' rights. 


Contact: Webmaster, Australian New Crops Website
australiannewcrops@gmail.com
Latest update March 2017 by: ANCW